ANA
2–1
OTT
Final · W
Anaheim Ducks
ANA · 23-36-3
2–1
FinalW
Ottawa Senators
OTT · 25-32-3
1ST2ND3RDT
ANA
031815216
OTT
1804018130
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Ducks lead the season series 2–0
ANA 23-36-3 · OTT 25-32-3 · Meeting 2 this season — the Ducks lead the season series 2–0
Ducks beat the Senators
The Ducks were outchanced (3.5 to 1.3 expected goals) but won 2–1 anyway. Lukas Dostal stopped 2.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Senators created the better chances: 3.5 expected goals to 1.3, on 30 and 16 shots on goal.
ANA 1.3 xG · 16 shots
OTT 3.5 xG · 30 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
0.2 · 1.3
2nd
0.6 · 0.4
3rd · the swing
0.5 · 1.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Mark Kastelic · 1st 02:44 · 0–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2
Ryan Strome · 2nd 04:42 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
3
Alex Killorn · 3rd 03:27 · 2–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Ducks win 16.
ANA 16%OTT 84%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Ducks shoot this way
Senators shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Mark Kastelic · 1st 02:44 · 0–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2
Ryan Strome · 2nd 04:42 · 1–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
3
Alex Killorn · 3rd 03:27 · GWG · 2–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
29/30 saves · 1 GA · 3.5 xGA
Stopped 2.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
14/16 saves · 2 GA · 1.3 xGA
Allowed 0.7 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
