CGY
1–2
MTL
Final · L
Calgary Flames
CGY · 10-10-3
1–2
FinalL
Montreal Canadiens
MTL · 12-10-1
1ST2ND3RDT
CGY
012113021146
MTL
160815219
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Flames trail the season series 0–1
CGY 10-10-3 · MTL 12-10-1 · First meeting this season — the Flames trail the season series 0–1
Flames fell to the Canadiens
The Flames created the better chances (4.6 to 2.1 expected goals) — and lost 1–2. Jake Allen stopped 3.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Flames created the better chances: 4.6 expected goals to 2.1, on 46 and 19 shots on goal.
CGY 4.6 xG · 46 shots
MTL 2.1 xG · 19 shots
0
1
2
3
4
5
1st
1.0 · 0.4
2nd
1.4 · 0.9
3rd · the swing
2.2 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Juraj Slafkovský · 1st 00:13 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Elias Lindholm · 2nd 19:31 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Cole Caufield · 3rd 06:29 · 1–2 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flames win 84.
CGY 84%MTL 16%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Flames shoot this way
Canadiens shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Juraj Slafkovský · 1st 00:13 · 0–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Elias Lindholm · 2nd 19:31 · 1–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Cole Caufield · 3rd 06:29 · PP · GWG · 1–2
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
17/19 saves · 2 GA · 2.1 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
45/46 saves · 1 GA · 4.6 xGA
Stopped 3.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
