Calgary Flames
CGY · 34-34-5
4–2
FinalW
Los Angeles Kings
LAK · 38-24-11
1ST2ND3RDT
CGY
21619110435
LAK
141509218
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Flames lead the season series 2–1
CGY 34-34-5 · LAK 38-24-11 · Meeting 3 this season — the Flames lead the season series 2–1
Flames beat the Kings
The Flames earned it: 3.1 expected goals to 1.8, and a 4–2 win to show for it. The Flames scored 3 power-play goals.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Flames created the better chances: 3.1 expected goals to 1.8, on 35 and 18 shots on goal.
CGY 3.1 xG · 35 shots
LAK 1.8 xG · 18 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.9 · 0.4
2nd
1.2 · 0.7
3rd
1.1 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Nazem Kadri · 1st 04:45 · 1–0 · snap shot, a good chance (24%)
2
Adrian Kempe · 1st 05:42 · 1–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
3
Martin Pospisil · 1st 11:56 · 2–1 · tip in shot, a good chance (14%)
4
Blake Coleman · 2nd 11:58 · 3–1 · wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (45%)
5
Anze Kopitar · 2nd 18:25 · 3–2 · snap shot, a good chance (17%)
6
MacKenzie Weegar · 3rd 11:30 · 4–2 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flames win 71.
CGY 71%LAK 29%
Goals and penalties
6 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Nazem Kadri · 1st 04:45 · PP · 1–0
Snap shot, a good chance (24%)
2
Adrian Kempe · 1st 05:42 · PP · 1–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
3
Martin Pospisil · 1st 11:56 · 2–1
Tip in shot, a good chance (14%)
4
Blake Coleman · 2nd 11:58 · PP · GWG · 3–1
Wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (45%)
5
Anze Kopitar · 2nd 18:25 · PP · 3–2
Snap shot, a good chance (17%)
6
MacKenzie Weegar · 3rd 11:30 · PP · 4–2
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
6
Jonathan Huberdeau, Yegor Sharangovich · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
4–2
No penalties
Goaltending
16/18 saves · 2 GA · 1.8 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
31/35 saves · 4 GA · 3.1 xGA
Allowed 0.9 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.