Colorado Avalanche
COL · 10-2
4–0
FinalW
Edmonton Oilers
EDM · 8-6
1ST2ND3RDT
COL
014312114440
EDM
0130605024
goals · shots on goal
Game 2 — the Avalanche lead the series 2–0
COL 10-2 · EDM 8-6 · Game 2 — the Avalanche lead the series 2–0
Avalanche beat the Oilers
The Avalanche earned it: 4.0 expected goals to 1.2, and a 4–0 win to show for it. Pavel Francouz stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Avalanche created the better chances: 4.0 expected goals to 1.2, on 40 and 24 shots on goal.
COL 4.0 xG · 40 shots
EDM 1.2 xG · 24 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.3 · 0.7
2nd
1.0 · 0.3
3rd · the swing
1.7 · 0.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Artturi Lehkonen · 2nd 03:58 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Josh Manson · 2nd 04:13 · 2–0 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
3
Mikko Rantanen · 2nd 06:02 · 3–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
4
Nathan MacKinnon · 3rd 15:20 · 4–0 · slap shot on a rebound, a good chance (20%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Avalanche win 90.
COL 90%EDM 10%
Goals and penalties
4 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Artturi Lehkonen · 2nd 03:58 · GWG · 1–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Josh Manson · 2nd 04:13 · 2–0
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
3
Mikko Rantanen · 2nd 06:02 · 3–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
4
Nathan MacKinnon · 3rd 15:20 · PP · 4–0
Slap shot on a rebound, a good chance (20%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
24/24 saves · 0 GA · 1.2 xGA
Stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
36/40 saves · 4 GA · 4.0 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.