Columbus Blue Jackets
CBJ · 22-32-10
1–2
FinalL
Nashville Predators
NSH · 37-25-3
1ST2ND3RDT
CBJ
010113011134
NSH
119016114249
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Blue Jackets trail the season series 0–1
CBJ 22-32-10 · NSH 37-25-3 · First meeting this season — the Blue Jackets trail the season series 0–1
Blue Jackets fell to the Predators
Chances were even (3.4 to 3.4 expected goals); the Blue Jackets lost 1–2. Kevin Lankinen stopped 2.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 3.4 expected goals to 3.4, on 34 and 49 shots on goal.
CBJ 3.4 xG · 34 shots
NSH 3.4 xG · 49 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.1 · 1.1
2nd
1.4 · 1.5
3rd
0.9 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Kiefer Sherwood · 1st 12:19 · 0–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
2
Alexandre Texier · 2nd 01:50 · 1–1 · wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (12%)
3
Luke Evangelista · 3rd 04:16 · 1–2 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blue Jackets win 50.
CBJ 50%NSH 50%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Kiefer Sherwood · 1st 12:19 · 0–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
2
Alexandre Texier · 2nd 01:50 · 1–1
Wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (12%)
3
Luke Evangelista · 3rd 04:16 · GWG · 1–2
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
47/49 saves · 2 GA · 3.4 xGA
Stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
33/34 saves · 1 GA · 3.4 xGA
Stopped 2.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.