Columbus Blue Jackets
CBJ · 26-39-12
6–2
FinalW
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 36-31-11
1ST2ND3RDT
CBJ
21421326633
PHI
010115114239
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 4 this season — the season series is tied 2–2
CBJ 26-39-12 · PHI 36-31-11 · Meeting 4 this season — the season series is tied 2–2
Blue Jackets beat the Flyers
Chances were even (3.0 to 3.3 expected goals); the Blue Jackets won 6–2. Samuel Ersson allowed 3.0 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 3.0 expected goals to 3.3, on 33 and 39 shots on goal.
CBJ 3.0 xG · 33 shots
PHI 3.3 xG · 39 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.4 · 1.1
2nd
1.0 · 1.7
3rd
0.6 · 0.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Erik Gudbranson · 1st 12:08 · 1–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2
Damon Severson · 1st 18:54 · 2–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3
Damon Severson · 2nd 08:23 · 3–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
4
· 2nd 14:32 · 3–1 · wrist shot, a great chance (30%)
5
Nick Blankenburg · 2nd 15:20 · 4–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
6
Zach Werenski · 3rd 09:29 · 5–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
7
Zach Werenski · 3rd 11:26 · 6–1 · snap shot, a good chance (24%)
8
· 3rd 15:08 · 6–2 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blue Jackets win 45.
CBJ 45%PHI 55%
Goals and penalties
8 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Erik Gudbranson · 1st 12:08 · 1–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2
Damon Severson · 1st 18:54 · 2–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3
Damon Severson · 2nd 08:23 · GWG · 3–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
4
· 2nd 14:32 · 3–1
Wrist shot, a great chance (30%)
5
Nick Blankenburg · 2nd 15:20 · 4–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
6
Zach Werenski · 3rd 09:29 · PP · 5–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
7
Zach Werenski · 3rd 11:26 · 6–1
Snap shot, a good chance (24%)
8
· 3rd 15:08 · 6–2
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
37/39 saves · 2 GA · 3.3 xGA
Stopped 1.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
27/33 saves · 6 GA · 3.0 xGA
Allowed 3.0 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.