CBJ 2–3 UTA Final / OT · L
Blue Jackets/Schedule/Recap Fri, Feb 7, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Columbus Blue Jackets
CBJ · 26-21-8
2–3
Final / OTL
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 23-22-9
1ST2ND3RDOTT CBJ 13190901222 UTA 0112110714333 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
CBJ 26-21-8 · UTA 23-22-9 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1

Blue Jackets fell to the Mammoth

The Blue Jackets were outchanced (3.9 to 2.9 expected goals) and lost it in overtime on Guenther's goal.

Who had the better chances

The Mammoth created the better chances: 3.9 expected goals to 2.9, on 33 and 22 shots on goal.

CBJ 2.9 xG · 22 shots UTA 3.9 xG · 33 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st · the swing 0.4 · 1.2
2nd 0.9 · 1.1
3rd 1.6 · 0.8
OT 0.1 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blue Jackets win 36.
CBJ 36%UTA 64%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Blue Jackets shoot this way Mammoth shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Jordan Harris · snap shot, a great chance (26%)
1–0
2nd period
2
Josh Doan, Michael Kesselring · snap shot, a good chance (24%)
1–1
3
12:33 Olli Maatta
Nick Bjugstad, Liam O'Brien · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1–2
4
19:21 Ivan Provorov SH
Zach Werenski · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2–2
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
Overtime
5
04:27 Dylan Guenther GWG
Connor Ingram · snap shot on a rebound, a great chance (40%)
2–3
No penalties
Goaltending
+0.9
vs expected
30/33 saves · 3 GA · 3.9 xGA Stopped 0.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
+0.9
vs expected
20/22 saves · 2 GA · 2.9 xGA Stopped 0.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team CBJUTA
Shots on goal
22
33
Expected goals
2.9
3.9
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0