CBJ
1–0
DAL
Final · W
Columbus Blue Jackets
CBJ · 23-20-7
1–0
FinalW
Dallas Stars
DAL · 28-14-9
1ST2ND3RDT
CBJ
190706122
DAL
06012010028
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Blue Jackets lead the season series 2–0
CBJ 23-20-7 · DAL 28-14-9 · Meeting 2 this season — the Blue Jackets lead the season series 2–0
Blue Jackets beat the Stars
The Blue Jackets were outchanced (2.4 to 1.4 expected goals) but won 1–0 anyway. Jet Greaves stopped 2.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Stars created the better chances: 2.4 expected goals to 1.4, on 28 and 22 shots on goal.
CBJ 1.4 xG · 22 shots
DAL 2.4 xG · 28 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.5 · 0.8
2nd
0.7 · 0.7
3rd
0.1 · 0.9
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Zach Werenski · 1st 08:48 · 1–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blue Jackets win 30.
CBJ 30%DAL 70%
Goals and penalties
1 goal · 3 penalties← Blue Jackets shoot this way
Stars shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Zach Werenski · 1st 08:48 · GWG · 1–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
1st period
PEN
2 min
Minor
11:31
Justin Hryckowian· Tripping
Justin Hryckowian· Tripping
Killed
Minor
PEN
2 min
Bench minor
13:57
Bench· Too many men on the ice
Bench· Too many men on the ice
Killed
Bench minor
2nd period
PEN
2 min
Minor
01:17
Damon Severson· Tripping
Damon Severson· Tripping
Killed
Minor
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
Goaltending
28/28 saves · 0 GA · 2.4 xGA
Stopped 2.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
21/22 saves · 1 GA · 1.4 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
The Blue Jackets went 0-for-1 on the power play and killed all 2 Stars power plays.