Edmonton Oilers
EDM · 20-16-2
1–2
FinalL
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 23-13-1
1ST2ND3RDT
EDM
09011112132
WPG
150517217
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Oilers trail the season series 0–1
EDM 20-16-2 · WPG 23-13-1 · First meeting this season — the Oilers trail the season series 0–1
Oilers fell to the Jets
The Oilers created the better chances (3.2 to 1.8 expected goals) — and lost 1–2. Connor Hellebuyck stopped 2.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Oilers created the better chances: 3.2 expected goals to 1.8, on 32 and 17 shots on goal.
EDM 3.2 xG · 32 shots
WPG 1.8 xG · 17 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.5
2nd · the swing
1.1 · 0.3
3rd
1.1 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Neal Pionk · 1st 15:44 · 0–1 · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2
Klim Kostin · 3rd 04:29 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (10%)
3
Kyle Connor · 3rd 06:55 · 1–2 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Oilers win 73.
EDM 73%WPG 27%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Neal Pionk · 1st 15:44 · PP · 0–1
Snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2
Klim Kostin · 3rd 04:29 · 1–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (10%)
3
Kyle Connor · 3rd 06:55 · GWG · 1–2
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
15/17 saves · 2 GA · 1.8 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
31/32 saves · 1 GA · 3.2 xGA
Stopped 2.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.