FLA
0–3
NSH
Final · L
Florida Panthers
FLA · 45-20-4
0–3
FinalL
Nashville Predators
NSH · 41-25-4
1ST2ND3RDT
FLA
05016012033
NSH
11411419337
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
FLA 45-20-4 · NSH 41-25-4 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Panthers fell to the Predators
The Panthers were outchanced (3.2 to 2.4 expected goals) and lost 0–3. Kevin Lankinen stopped 2.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Predators created the better chances: 3.2 expected goals to 2.4, on 37 and 33 shots on goal.
FLA 2.4 xG · 33 shots
NSH 3.2 xG · 37 shots
0
1
2
3
1st · the swing
0.4 · 1.4
2nd
1.2 · 1.0
3rd
0.7 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Gustav Nyquist · 1st 17:47 · 0–1 · wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (43%)
2
Filip Forsberg · 2nd 07:32 · 0–2 · tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
3
Filip Forsberg · 3rd 14:19 · 0–3 · backhand shot, a great chance (56%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Panthers win 36.
FLA 36%NSH 64%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Panthers shoot this way
Predators shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Gustav Nyquist · 1st 17:47 · GWG · 0–1
Wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (43%)
2
Filip Forsberg · 2nd 07:32 · PP · 0–2
Tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
3
Filip Forsberg · 3rd 14:19 · 0–3
Backhand shot, a great chance (56%)
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
34/37 saves · 3 GA · 3.2 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
33/33 saves · 0 GA · 2.4 xGA
Stopped 2.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
