FLA
4–1
EDM
Final · W
Florida Panthers
FLA · 14-5
4–1
FinalW
Edmonton Oilers
EDM · 12-8
1ST2ND3RDT
FLA
0911337429
EDM
1403012119
goals · shots on goal
Game 2 — the Panthers lead the series 2–0
FLA 14-5 · EDM 12-8 · Game 2 — the Panthers lead the series 2–0
Panthers beat the Oilers
The Panthers earned it: 2.7 expected goals to 1.5, and a 4–1 win to show for it.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Panthers created the better chances: 2.7 expected goals to 1.5, on 29 and 19 shots on goal.
FLA 2.7 xG · 29 shots
EDM 1.5 xG · 19 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.6 · 0.3
2nd
1.0 · 0.2
3rd
1.1 · 0.9
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Mattias Ekholm · 1st 11:17 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
2
Niko Mikkola · 2nd 09:34 · 1–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Evan Rodrigues · 3rd 03:11 · 2–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
4
Evan Rodrigues · 3rd 12:26 · 3–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
5
Aaron Ekblad · 3rd 17:32 · 4–1 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Panthers win 72.
FLA 72%EDM 28%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Panthers shoot this way
Oilers shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Mattias Ekholm · 1st 11:17 · 0–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
2
Niko Mikkola · 2nd 09:34 · 1–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Evan Rodrigues · 3rd 03:11 · GWG · 2–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
4
Evan Rodrigues · 3rd 12:26 · PP · 3–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
5
Aaron Ekblad · 3rd 17:32 · EN · 4–1
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
3
Unassisted · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2–1
4
Anton Lundell, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
3–1
No penalties
Goaltending
18/19 saves · 1 GA · 1.5 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
25/28 saves · 3 GA · 2.7 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
