FLA
1–5
MIN
Final · L
Florida Panthers
FLA · 4-3-1
1–5
FinalL
Minnesota Wild
MIN · 4-0-2
1ST2ND3RDT
FLA
0911204125
MIN
2531106522
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Panthers trail the season series 0–1
FLA 4-3-1 · MIN 4-0-2 · First meeting this season — the Panthers trail the season series 0–1
Panthers fell to the Wild
Chances were even (2.0 to 2.2 expected goals); the Panthers lost 1–5. Sergei Bobrovsky allowed 3.7 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 2.0 expected goals to 2.2, on 25 and 22 shots on goal.
FLA 2.0 xG · 25 shots
MIN 2.2 xG · 22 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.7 · 0.6
2nd
1.1 · 0.7
3rd
0.2 · 0.9
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Marco Rossi · 1st 11:40 · 0–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
2
Marcus Johansson · 1st 12:02 · 0–2 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
3
Matt Boldy · 2nd 02:40 · 0–3 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
4
Sam Bennett · 2nd 11:19 · 1–3 · deflected shot, a good chance (21%)
5
Mats Zuccarello · 2nd 13:58 · 1–4 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
6
Joel Eriksson Ek · 2nd 16:05 · 1–5 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Panthers win 46.
FLA 46%MIN 54%
Goals and penalties
6 goals · 0 penalties← Panthers shoot this way
Wild shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Marco Rossi · 1st 11:40 · 0–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
2
Marcus Johansson · 1st 12:02 · GWG · 0–2
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
3
Matt Boldy · 2nd 02:40 · PP · 0–3
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
4
Sam Bennett · 2nd 11:19 · 1–3
Deflected shot, a good chance (21%)
5
Mats Zuccarello · 2nd 13:58 · 1–4
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
6
Joel Eriksson Ek · 2nd 16:05 · 1–5
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3
Mats Zuccarello, Joel Eriksson Ek · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
0–3
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
11/16 saves · 5 GA · 1.3 xGA
Allowed 3.7 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
6/6 saves · 0 GA · 0.9 xGA
Stopped 0.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
