FLA
0–3
CAR
Final · L
Florida Panthers
FLA · 11-5
0–3
FinalL
Carolina Hurricanes
CAR · 9-5
1ST2ND3RDT
FLA
070508020
CAR
01111225328
goals · shots on goal
Game 4 — the Panthers lead the series 3–1
FLA 11-5 · CAR 9-5 · Game 4 — the Panthers lead the series 3–1
Panthers fell to the Hurricanes
The Panthers were outchanced (2.3 to 1.4 expected goals) and lost 0–3. Frederik Andersen stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Hurricanes created the better chances: 2.3 expected goals to 1.4, on 28 and 20 shots on goal.
FLA 1.4 xG · 20 shots
CAR 2.3 xG · 28 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.4 · 0.5
2nd · the swing
0.3 · 1.3
3rd
0.8 · 0.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Logan Stankoven · 2nd 10:45 · 0–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Sebastian Aho · 3rd 17:49 · 0–2 · wrist shot, into an empty net
3
Jordan Staal · 3rd 18:15 · 0–3 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Panthers win 33.
FLA 33%CAR 67%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Panthers shoot this way
Hurricanes shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Logan Stankoven · 2nd 10:45 · GWG · 0–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Sebastian Aho · 3rd 17:49 · EN · 0–2
Wrist shot, into an empty net
3
Jordan Staal · 3rd 18:15 · EN · 0–3
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
25/26 saves · 1 GA · 2.3 xGA
Stopped 1.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
20/20 saves · 0 GA · 1.4 xGA
Stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
