FLA 3–4 UTA Final · L
Panthers/Schedule/Recap Tue, Jan 27, 2026 · 2025-26 regular season
Florida Panthers
FLA · 28-21-3
3–4
FinalL
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 28-21-4
1ST2ND3RDT FLA 01121019330 UTA 171528420 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
FLA 28-21-3 · UTA 28-21-4 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1

Panthers fell to the Mammoth

The Panthers created the better chances (2.7 to 2.1 expected goals) — and lost 3–4.

Who had the better chances

The Panthers created the better chances: 2.7 expected goals to 2.1, on 30 and 20 shots on goal.

FLA 2.7 xG · 30 shots UTA 2.1 xG · 20 shots
0
1
2
3
1st 0.7 · 0.7
2nd 1.1 · 0.7
3rd 0.9 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Panthers win 62.
FLA 62%UTA 38%

Goals and penalties

7 goals · 0 penalties
← Panthers shoot this way Mammoth shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
15:46 Nick Schmaltz SH
Unassisted · backhand shot, a good chance (21%)
0–1
2nd period
2
Unassisted · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
1–1
3
03:46 Sean Durzi
Jack McBain, Michael Carcone · wrist shot, a good chance (21%)
1–2
4
Unassisted · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
2–2
3rd period
5
Sean Durzi · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2–3
6
19:04 Barrett Hayton ENGWG
Kevin Stenlund · wrist shot, into an empty net
2–4
7
19:44 Carter Verhaeghe EXTRA ATTACKER
Sam Bennett, Brad Marchand · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
3–4
No penalties
Goaltending
−0.9
vs expected
16/19 saves · 3 GA · 2.1 xGA Allowed 0.9 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
−0.3
vs expected
27/30 saves · 3 GA · 2.7 xGA Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
Team FLAUTA
Shots on goal
30
20
Expected goals
2.7
2.1
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0