New York Rangers
NYR · 39-19-10
4–2
FinalW
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 34-24-10
1ST2ND3RDT
NYR
11219214435
PIT
07111114232
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Rangers trail the season series 1–2
NYR 39-19-10 · PIT 34-24-10 · Meeting 3 this season — the Rangers trail the season series 1–2
Rangers beat the Penguins
Chances were even (3.0 to 2.8 expected goals); the Rangers won 4–2. An empty-net goal padded the final score; it was a one-goal game until then.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 3.0 expected goals to 2.8, on 35 and 32 shots on goal.
NYR 3.0 xG · 35 shots
PIT 2.8 xG · 32 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.1 · 0.4
2nd
0.8 · 1.2
3rd
1.1 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Mika Zibanejad · 1st 02:51 · 1–0 · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2
Rickard Rakell · 2nd 14:40 · 1–1 · snap shot, a good chance (25%)
3
· 2nd 16:53 · 2–1 · wrist shot, a great chance (27%)
4
Jake Guentzel · 3rd 09:09 · 2–2 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
5
Chris Kreider · 3rd 11:45 · 3–2 · wrist shot, a good chance (17%)
6
Chris Kreider · 3rd 19:10 · 4–2 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Rangers win 53.
NYR 53%PIT 47%
Goals and penalties
6 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Mika Zibanejad · 1st 02:51 · 1–0
Snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2
Rickard Rakell · 2nd 14:40 · 1–1
Snap shot, a good chance (25%)
3
· 2nd 16:53 · 2–1
Wrist shot, a great chance (27%)
4
Jake Guentzel · 3rd 09:09 · 2–2
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
5
Chris Kreider · 3rd 11:45 · GWG · 3–2
Wrist shot, a good chance (17%)
6
Chris Kreider · 3rd 19:10 · EN · 4–2
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
30/32 saves · 2 GA · 2.8 xGA
Stopped 0.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
31/34 saves · 3 GA · 3.0 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.