OTT
3–0
ANA
Final · W
Ottawa Senators
OTT · 12-14-2
3–0
FinalW
Anaheim Ducks
ANA · 7-19-3
1ST2ND3RDT
OTT
211013114338
ANA
05012015032
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Senators lead the season series 2–0
OTT 12-14-2 · ANA 7-19-3 · Meeting 2 this season — the Senators lead the season series 2–0
Senators beat the Ducks
The Senators earned it: 4.1 expected goals to 2.5, and a 3–0 win to show for it. Cam Talbot stopped 2.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Senators created the better chances: 4.1 expected goals to 2.5, on 38 and 32 shots on goal.
OTT 4.1 xG · 38 shots
ANA 2.5 xG · 32 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.1 · 0.4
2nd
1.3 · 0.9
3rd
1.7 · 1.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Parker Kelly · 1st 05:42 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (14%)
2
Alex DeBrincat · 1st 10:19 · 2–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
3
Alex DeBrincat · 3rd 12:00 · 3–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (21%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Senators win 72.
OTT 72%ANA 28%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Senators shoot this way
Ducks shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Parker Kelly · 1st 05:42 · GWG · 1–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (14%)
2
Alex DeBrincat · 1st 10:19 · PP · 2–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
3
Alex DeBrincat · 3rd 12:00 · PP · 3–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (21%)
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
32/32 saves · 0 GA · 2.5 xGA
Stopped 2.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
35/38 saves · 3 GA · 4.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
