Ottawa Senators
OTT · 39-35-7
3–2
FinalW
Carolina Hurricanes
CAR · 50-21-9
1ST2ND3RDT
OTT
210012110332
CAR
0918112229
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Senators trail the season series 1–2
OTT 39-35-7 · CAR 50-21-9 · Meeting 3 this season — the Senators trail the season series 1–2
Senators beat the Hurricanes
The Senators earned it: 3.6 expected goals to 2.9, and a 3–2 win to show for it.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Senators created the better chances: 3.6 expected goals to 2.9, on 32 and 29 shots on goal.
OTT 3.6 xG · 32 shots
CAR 2.9 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
0.8 · 0.5
2nd · the swing
1.7 · 0.9
3rd
1.1 · 1.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Claude Giroux · 1st 05:51 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2
Tim Stützle · 1st 17:26 · 2–0 · snap shot, a good chance (18%)
3
Brett Pesce · 2nd 15:30 · 2–1 · snap shot, a good chance (12%)
4
Brent Burns · 3rd 02:23 · 2–2 · slap shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
5
Claude Giroux · 3rd 09:37 · 3–2 · backhand shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Senators win 61.
OTT 61%CAR 39%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Claude Giroux · 1st 05:51 · 1–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2
Tim Stützle · 1st 17:26 · 2–0
Snap shot, a good chance (18%)
3
Brett Pesce · 2nd 15:30 · 2–1
Snap shot, a good chance (12%)
4
Brent Burns · 3rd 02:23 · PP · 2–2
Slap shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
5
Claude Giroux · 3rd 09:37 · GWG · 3–2
Backhand shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
4
Seth Jarvis, Martin Necas · slap shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2–2
No penalties
Goaltending
27/29 saves · 2 GA · 2.9 xGA
Stopped 0.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
29/32 saves · 3 GA · 3.6 xGA
Stopped 0.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.