PHI
0–3
SJS
Final · L
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 4-2-0
0–3
FinalL
San Jose Sharks
SJS · 2-6-0
1ST2ND3RDT
PHI
0905016030
SJS
0721216325
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Flyers trail the season series 0–1
PHI 4-2-0 · SJS 2-6-0 · First meeting this season — the Flyers trail the season series 0–1
Flyers fell to the Sharks
Chances were even (1.9 to 2.3 expected goals); the Flyers lost 0–3. James Reimer stopped 1.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 1.9 expected goals to 2.3, on 30 and 25 shots on goal.
PHI 1.9 xG · 30 shots
SJS 2.3 xG · 25 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.7 · 0.9
2nd
0.3 · 1.0
3rd
0.8 · 0.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Erik Karlsson · 2nd 09:34 · 0–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
2
Steven Lorentz · 2nd 18:29 · 0–2 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Nico Sturm · 3rd 16:06 · 0–3 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 42.
PHI 42%SJS 58%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Flyers shoot this way
Sharks shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Erik Karlsson · 2nd 09:34 · GWG · 0–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (3%) that found a way in
2
Steven Lorentz · 2nd 18:29 · 0–2
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Nico Sturm · 3rd 16:06 · EN · 0–3
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
22/24 saves · 2 GA · 2.3 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
30/30 saves · 0 GA · 1.9 xGA
Stopped 1.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
