PHI
3–0
DET
Final · W
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 28-32-12
3–0
FinalW
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 31-32-9
1ST2ND3RDT
PHI
062818322
DET
0808013029
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Flyers lead the season series 3–0
PHI 28-32-12 · DET 31-32-9 · Meeting 3 this season — the Flyers lead the season series 3–0
Flyers beat the Red Wings
The Flyers were outchanced (3.4 to 2.5 expected goals) but won 3–0 anyway. Carter Hart stopped 3.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Red Wings created the better chances: 3.4 expected goals to 2.5, on 29 and 22 shots on goal.
PHI 2.5 xG · 22 shots
DET 3.4 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.4
2nd
0.9 · 0.9
3rd · the swing
0.6 · 2.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Kieffer Bellows · 2nd 10:10 · 1–0 · snap shot on a rebound, a good chance (14%)
2
Scott Laughton · 2nd 19:24 · 2–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
3
Tyson Foerster · 3rd 18:41 · 3–0 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 35.
PHI 35%DET 65%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Flyers shoot this way
Red Wings shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Kieffer Bellows · 2nd 10:10 · GWG · 1–0
Snap shot on a rebound, a good chance (14%)
2
Scott Laughton · 2nd 19:24 · 2–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
3
Tyson Foerster · 3rd 18:41 · EN · 3–0
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
29/29 saves · 0 GA · 3.4 xGA
Stopped 3.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
19/21 saves · 2 GA · 2.5 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
