PHI
1–0
DET
Final · W
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 17-10-3
1–0
FinalW
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 15-11-4
1ST2ND3RDT
PHI
113010011134
DET
06011015032
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Flyers lead the season series 1–0
PHI 17-10-3 · DET 15-11-4 · First meeting this season — the Flyers lead the season series 1–0
Flyers beat the Red Wings
Chances were even (2.2 to 2.3 expected goals); the Flyers won 1–0. Samuel Ersson stopped 2.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 2.2 expected goals to 2.3, on 34 and 32 shots on goal.
PHI 2.2 xG · 34 shots
DET 2.3 xG · 32 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.8 · 0.6
2nd
1.0 · 1.0
3rd
0.4 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Cam York · 1st 06:21 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 49.
PHI 49%DET 51%
Goals and penalties
1 goal · 0 penalties← Flyers shoot this way
Red Wings shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Cam York · 1st 06:21 · GWG · 1–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
32/32 saves · 0 GA · 2.3 xGA
Stopped 2.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
18/18 saves · 0 GA · 1.0 xGA
Stopped 1.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
