PHI
4–1
WPG
Final · W
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 27-19-6
4–1
FinalW
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 30-14-5
1ST2ND3RDT
PHI
3131305421
WPG
04015110129
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Flyers lead the season series 2–0
PHI 27-19-6 · WPG 30-14-5 · Meeting 2 this season — the Flyers lead the season series 2–0
Flyers beat the Jets
The Flyers were outchanced (4.1 to 2.5 expected goals) but won 4–1 anyway. Samuel Ersson stopped 3.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Jets created the better chances: 4.1 expected goals to 2.5, on 29 and 21 shots on goal.
PHI 2.5 xG · 21 shots
WPG 4.1 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.2 · 0.4
2nd · the swing
0.3 · 2.4
3rd
0.9 · 1.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Tyson Foerster · 1st 03:37 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (20%)
2
Travis Konecny · 1st 14:03 · 2–0 · snap shot, a good chance (22%)
3
Morgan Frost · 1st 18:06 · 3–0 · wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (24%)
4
Ryan Poehling · 2nd 02:29 · 4–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
5
Kyle Connor · 3rd 14:48 · 4–1 · backhand shot, a great chance (29%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 26.
PHI 26%WPG 74%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Flyers shoot this way
Jets shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Tyson Foerster · 1st 03:37 · 1–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (20%)
2
Travis Konecny · 1st 14:03 · GWG · 2–0
Snap shot, a good chance (22%)
3
Morgan Frost · 1st 18:06 · 3–0
Wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (24%)
4
Ryan Poehling · 2nd 02:29 · SH · 4–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
5
Kyle Connor · 3rd 14:48 · 4–1
Backhand shot, a great chance (29%)
1st period
2nd period
4
Unassisted · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
4–0
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
28/29 saves · 1 GA · 4.1 xGA
Stopped 3.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
17/21 saves · 4 GA · 2.5 xGA
Allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
