PHI 2–4 UTA Final · L
Flyers/Schedule/Recap Mon, Dec 9, 2024 · 2024-25 regular season
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 12-12-4
2–4
FinalL
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 12-11-4
1ST2ND3RDT PHI 072908224 UTA 0123815425 goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Flyers trail the season series 0–1
PHI 12-12-4 · UTA 12-11-4 · First meeting this season — the Flyers trail the season series 0–1

Flyers fell to the Mammoth

The Flyers created the better chances (3.1 to 2.5 expected goals) — and lost 2–4. Samuel Ersson allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.

Who had the better chances

The Flyers created the better chances: 3.1 expected goals to 2.5, on 24 and 25 shots on goal.

PHI 3.1 xG · 24 shots UTA 2.5 xG · 25 shots
0
1
2
3
1st 1.0 · 1.2
2nd 1.4 · 0.9
3rd 0.8 · 0.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 60.
PHI 60%UTA 40%

Goals and penalties

6 goals · 0 penalties
← Flyers shoot this way Mammoth shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
1
Robert Bortuzzo · backhand shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
0–1
2
07:20 Joel Farabee
Nick Seeler, Travis Konecny · wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (33%)
1–1
3
Mikhail Sergachev, Jack McBain · tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
1–2
4
13:34 Owen Tippett
Nick Seeler, Matvei Michkov · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
2–2
5
15:30 Logan Cooley PPGWG
Dylan Guenther, Clayton Keller · backhand shot, a good chance (22%)
2–3
3rd period
6
15:43 Kevin Stenlund SH
Unassisted · wrist shot, a good chance (11%)
2–4
No penalties
Goaltending
−1.5
vs expected
21/25 saves · 4 GA · 2.5 xGA Allowed 1.5 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
+1.1
vs expected
22/24 saves · 2 GA · 3.1 xGA Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Team PHIUTA
Shots on goal
24
25
Expected goals
3.1
2.5
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
1/0
Penalty minutes
0
0