PHI 3–2 PIT Final · W
Flyers/Schedule/Recap Sun, Feb 9, 2025 · 2024-25 regular season
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 24-26-7
3–2
FinalW
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 23-25-9
1ST2ND3RDT PHI 1217111320 PIT 010111112233 goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
PHI 24-26-7 · PIT 23-25-9 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1

Flyers beat the Penguins

The Flyers were outchanced (4.5 to 1.9 expected goals) but won 3–2 anyway. Samuel Ersson stopped 2.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.

Who had the better chances

The Penguins created the better chances: 4.5 expected goals to 1.9, on 33 and 20 shots on goal.

PHI 1.9 xG · 20 shots PIT 4.5 xG · 33 shots
0
1
2
3
4
5
1st 0.2 · 1.0
2nd 0.7 · 1.0
3rd · the swing 1.0 · 2.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Flyers win 15.
PHI 15%PIT 85%

Goals and penalties

5 goals · 0 penalties
← Flyers shoot this way Penguins shoot this way →
On net Missed Bigger = better chance 1Goal, numbered to the list
1st period
1
Travis Konecny, Andrei Kuzmenko · backhand shot, a good chance (16%)
1–0
2nd period
2
Matt Grzelcyk, Rickard Rakell · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
1–1
3
Unassisted · deflected shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2–1
3rd period
4
04:27 Travis Konecny EXTRA ATTACKERGWG
Cam York, Travis Sanheim · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3–1
5
Kevin Hayes, Danton Heinen · backhand shot, a great chance (40%)
3–2
No penalties
Goaltending
+2.5
vs expected
31/33 saves · 2 GA · 4.5 xGA Stopped 2.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
−1.1
vs expected
17/20 saves · 3 GA · 1.9 xGA Allowed 1.1 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Team PHIPIT
Shots on goal
20
33
Expected goals
1.9
4.5
Hits
0
0
Blocks
0
0
Power play
0/0
0/0
Penalty minutes
0
0