PIT
2–3
SEA
Final · L
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 4-6-2
2–3
FinalL
Seattle Kraken
SEA · 7-4-2
1ST2ND3RDT
PIT
01311519237
SEA
0101929328
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Penguins trail the season series 0–2
PIT 4-6-2 · SEA 7-4-2 · Meeting 2 this season — the Penguins trail the season series 0–2
Penguins fell to the Kraken
The Penguins created the better chances (3.2 to 2.2 expected goals) — and lost 2–3. Martin Jones stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Penguins created the better chances: 3.2 expected goals to 2.2, on 37 and 28 shots on goal.
PIT 3.2 xG · 37 shots
SEA 2.2 xG · 28 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.7
2nd
1.4 · 0.8
3rd
0.8 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Sidney Crosby · 2nd 05:24 · 1–0 · slap shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Vince Dunn · 2nd 07:48 · 1–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Yanni Gourde · 3rd 07:48 · 1–2 · wrist shot, a good chance (18%)
4
Jake Guentzel · 3rd 09:51 · 2–2 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
5
Brandon Tanev · 3rd 16:21 · 2–3 · wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Penguins win 66.
PIT 66%SEA 34%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Penguins shoot this way
Kraken shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Sidney Crosby · 2nd 05:24 · 1–0
Slap shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Vince Dunn · 2nd 07:48 · 1–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
3
Yanni Gourde · 3rd 07:48 · 1–2
Wrist shot, a good chance (18%)
4
Jake Guentzel · 3rd 09:51 · 2–2
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
5
Brandon Tanev · 3rd 16:21 · GWG · 2–3
Wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
25/28 saves · 3 GA · 2.2 xGA
Allowed 0.8 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
35/37 saves · 2 GA · 3.2 xGA
Stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
