PIT
1–2
LAK
Final · L
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 24-21-7
1–2
FinalL
Los Angeles Kings
LAK · 27-16-10
1ST2ND3RDT
PIT
11207011130
LAK
011013210234
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
PIT 24-21-7 · LAK 27-16-10 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Penguins fell to the Kings
The Penguins were outchanced (2.8 to 2.1 expected goals) and lost 1–2. Cam Talbot stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Kings created the better chances: 2.8 expected goals to 2.1, on 34 and 30 shots on goal.
PIT 2.1 xG · 30 shots
LAK 2.8 xG · 34 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.1 · 0.8
2nd
0.4 · 1.0
3rd
0.6 · 0.9
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Sidney Crosby · 1st 18:43 · 1–0 · slap shot, a good chance (10%)
2
Adrian Kempe · 3rd 13:49 · 1–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
3
Adrian Kempe · 3rd 16:50 · 1–2 · snap shot, a good chance (15%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Penguins win 38.
PIT 38%LAK 62%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Penguins shoot this way
Kings shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Sidney Crosby · 1st 18:43 · PP · 1–0
Slap shot, a good chance (10%)
2
Adrian Kempe · 3rd 13:49 · 1–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
3
Adrian Kempe · 3rd 16:50 · SH · GWG · 1–2
Snap shot, a good chance (15%)
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
32/34 saves · 2 GA · 2.8 xGA
Stopped 0.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
29/30 saves · 1 GA · 2.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
