PIT
1–4
WPG
Final · L
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 7-11-4
1–4
FinalL
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 17-3-0
1ST2ND3RDT
PIT
080515118
WPG
11221315430
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Penguins trail the season series 0–2
PIT 7-11-4 · WPG 17-3-0 · Meeting 2 this season — the Penguins trail the season series 0–2
Penguins fell to the Jets
The Penguins were outchanced (3.1 to 1.9 expected goals) and lost 1–4.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Jets created the better chances: 3.1 expected goals to 1.9, on 30 and 18 shots on goal.
PIT 1.9 xG · 18 shots
WPG 3.1 xG · 30 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.8 · 1.4
2nd · the swing
0.3 · 1.2
3rd
0.8 · 0.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Nino Niederreiter · 1st 01:22 · 0–1 · backhand shot, a great chance (39%)
2
Vladislav Namestnikov · 2nd 04:53 · 0–2 · backhand shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
3
Gabriel Vilardi · 2nd 19:01 · 0–3 · wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
4
Michael Bunting · 3rd 05:49 · 1–3 · wrist shot, a good chance (23%)
5
Kyle Connor · 3rd 18:49 · 1–4 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Penguins win 30.
PIT 30%WPG 70%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Penguins shoot this way
Jets shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Nino Niederreiter · 1st 01:22 · 0–1
Backhand shot, a great chance (39%)
2
Vladislav Namestnikov · 2nd 04:53 · GWG · 0–2
Backhand shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
3
Gabriel Vilardi · 2nd 19:01 · PP · 0–3
Wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
4
Michael Bunting · 3rd 05:49 · PP · 1–3
Wrist shot, a good chance (23%)
5
Kyle Connor · 3rd 18:49 · EN · 1–4
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
26/29 saves · 3 GA · 3.1 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
17/18 saves · 1 GA · 1.9 xGA
Stopped 0.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
