SJS
3–0
WPG
Final · W
San Jose Sharks
SJS · 20-39-15
3–0
FinalW
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 41-31-3
1ST2ND3RDT
SJS
11208210330
WPG
016010015041
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Sharks lead the season series 2–0
SJS 20-39-15 · WPG 41-31-3 · Meeting 2 this season — the Sharks lead the season series 2–0
Sharks beat the Jets
The Sharks were outchanced (3.8 to 2.5 expected goals) but won 3–0 anyway. James Reimer stopped 3.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Jets created the better chances: 3.8 expected goals to 2.5, on 41 and 30 shots on goal.
SJS 2.5 xG · 30 shots
WPG 3.8 xG · 41 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.1 · 0.9
2nd
0.7 · 1.2
3rd · the swing
0.7 · 1.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
· 1st 09:51 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
2
· 3rd 02:23 · 2–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Martin Kaut · 3rd 17:57 · 3–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (10%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Sharks win 31.
SJS 31%WPG 69%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Sharks shoot this way
Jets shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
· 1st 09:51 · GWG · 1–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
2
· 3rd 02:23 · 2–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Martin Kaut · 3rd 17:57 · PP · 3–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (10%)
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
41/41 saves · 0 GA · 3.8 xGA
Stopped 3.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
27/30 saves · 3 GA · 2.5 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
