SJS
2–1
PHI
Final · W
San Jose Sharks
SJS · 1-10-1
2–1
FinalW
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 5-7-1
1ST2ND3RDT
SJS
141708219
PHI
013111015139
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Sharks lead the season series 1–0
SJS 1-10-1 · PHI 5-7-1 · First meeting this season — the Sharks lead the season series 1–0
Sharks beat the Flyers
The Sharks were outchanced (2.6 to 1.8 expected goals) but won 2–1 anyway. Mackenzie Blackwood stopped 1.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Flyers created the better chances: 2.6 expected goals to 1.8, on 39 and 19 shots on goal.
SJS 1.8 xG · 19 shots
PHI 2.6 xG · 39 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.7 · 0.7
2nd
0.6 · 0.7
3rd
0.5 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Anthony Duclair · 1st 01:43 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
2
William Eklund · 2nd 16:18 · 2–0 · slap shot, a good chance (12%)
3
Joel Farabee · 2nd 18:51 · 2–1 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Sharks win 35.
SJS 35%PHI 65%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Sharks shoot this way
Flyers shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Anthony Duclair · 1st 01:43 · 1–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
2
William Eklund · 2nd 16:18 · PP · GWG · 2–0
Slap shot, a good chance (12%)
3
Joel Farabee · 2nd 18:51 · 2–1
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
38/39 saves · 1 GA · 2.6 xGA
Stopped 1.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
17/19 saves · 2 GA · 1.8 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
