SJS
2–1
OTT
Final · W
San Jose Sharks
SJS · 16-40-7
2–1
FinalW
Ottawa Senators
OTT · 25-33-4
1ST2ND3RDT
SJS
1101704221
OTT
09110013132
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
SJS 16-40-7 · OTT 25-33-4 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Sharks beat the Senators
The Sharks were outchanced (3.2 to 2.3 expected goals) but won 2–1 anyway. Magnus Chrona stopped 2.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Senators created the better chances: 3.2 expected goals to 2.3, on 32 and 21 shots on goal.
SJS 2.3 xG · 21 shots
OTT 3.2 xG · 32 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.8
2nd
1.0 · 1.3
3rd · the swing
0.2 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
· 1st 06:24 · 1–0 · deflected shot, a good chance (24%)
2
Tim Stützle · 2nd 09:18 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
3
· 2nd 14:37 · 2–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Sharks win 35.
SJS 35%OTT 65%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Sharks shoot this way
Senators shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
· 1st 06:24 · PP · 1–0
Deflected shot, a good chance (24%)
2
Tim Stützle · 2nd 09:18 · PP · 1–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
3
· 2nd 14:37 · PP · GWG · 2–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
31/32 saves · 1 GA · 3.2 xGA
Stopped 2.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
19/21 saves · 2 GA · 2.3 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
