San Jose Sharks
SJS · 17-50-8
1–2
FinalL
Los Angeles Kings
LAK · 40-25-11
1ST2ND3RDT
SJS
080513116
LAK
21204011227
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 4 this season — the Sharks trail the season series 1–3
SJS 17-50-8 · LAK 40-25-11 · Meeting 4 this season — the Sharks trail the season series 1–3
Sharks fell to the Kings
The Sharks were outchanced (2.7 to 1.6 expected goals) and lost 1–2.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Kings created the better chances: 2.7 expected goals to 1.6, on 27 and 16 shots on goal.
SJS 1.6 xG · 16 shots
LAK 2.7 xG · 27 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.6 · 0.9
2nd
0.6 · 0.5
3rd · the swing
0.4 · 1.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Adrian Kempe · 1st 10:55 · 0–1 · wrist shot off the rush, a good chance (24%)
2
· 1st 11:13 · 0–2 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
3
Klim Kostin · 3rd 18:08 · 1–2 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Sharks win 29.
SJS 29%LAK 71%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Adrian Kempe · 1st 10:55 · 0–1
Wrist shot off the rush, a good chance (24%)
2
· 1st 11:13 · GWG · 0–2
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
3
Klim Kostin · 3rd 18:08 · EXTRA ATTACKER · 1–2
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
25/27 saves · 2 GA · 2.7 xGA
Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
15/16 saves · 1 GA · 1.6 xGA
Stopped 0.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.