San Jose Sharks
SJS · 4-8-2
2–1
Final / OTW
Columbus Blue Jackets
CBJ · 5-5-2
1ST2ND3RDOTT
SJS
061110713227
CBJ
01301711802150
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Sharks lead the season series 1–0
SJS 4-8-2 · CBJ 5-5-2 · First meeting this season — the Sharks lead the season series 1–0
Sharks beat the Blue Jackets
The Sharks were outchanced (3.9 to 1.9 expected goals) but won it in overtime on Wennberg's goal anyway. Vitek Vanecek stopped 2.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Blue Jackets created the better chances: 3.9 expected goals to 1.9, on 50 and 27 shots on goal.
SJS 1.9 xG · 27 shots
CBJ 3.9 xG · 50 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
0.5 · 1.1
2nd
0.6 · 0.8
3rd · the swing
0.3 · 1.6
OT
0.5 · 0.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
· 2nd 18:49 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Kirill Marchenko · 3rd 09:17 · 1–1 · wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (32%)
3
Alexander Wennberg · OT 03:11 · 2–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (21%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Sharks win 21.
SJS 21%CBJ 79%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
· 2nd 18:49 · 1–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Kirill Marchenko · 3rd 09:17 · 1–1
Wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (32%)
3
Alexander Wennberg · OT 03:11 · GWG · 2–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (21%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
Overtime
No penalties
Goaltending
49/50 saves · 1 GA · 3.9 xGA
Stopped 2.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
25/27 saves · 2 GA · 1.9 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.