SJS
0–3
EDM
Final · L
San Jose Sharks
SJS · 20-50-12
0–3
FinalL
Edmonton Oilers
EDM · 48-29-5
1ST2ND3RDT
SJS
060606018
EDM
1819111328
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 4 this season — the Sharks trail the season series 0–4
SJS 20-50-12 · EDM 48-29-5 · Meeting 4 this season — the Sharks trail the season series 0–4
Sharks fell to the Oilers
The Sharks were outchanced (2.6 to 1.4 expected goals) and lost 0–3. Stuart Skinner stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Oilers created the better chances: 2.6 expected goals to 1.4, on 28 and 18 shots on goal.
SJS 1.4 xG · 18 shots
EDM 2.6 xG · 28 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.6 · 0.4
2nd
0.4 · 0.9
3rd · the swing
0.4 · 1.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Ty Emberson · 1st 08:20 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2
Max Jones · 2nd 10:17 · 0–2 · wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Corey Perry · 3rd 17:23 · 0–3 · wrist shot off the rush, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Sharks win 27.
SJS 27%EDM 73%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Sharks shoot this way
Oilers shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Ty Emberson · 1st 08:20 · GWG · 0–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2
Max Jones · 2nd 10:17 · 0–2
Wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
3
Corey Perry · 3rd 17:23 · EN · 0–3
Wrist shot off the rush, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
25/27 saves · 2 GA · 2.6 xGA
Stopped 0.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
18/18 saves · 0 GA · 1.4 xGA
Stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
