Seattle Kraken
SEA · 20-18-9
6–2
FinalW
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 14-32-2
1ST2ND3RDT
SEA
2821129628
CHI
11506113234
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Kraken lead the season series 2–1
SEA 20-18-9 · CHI 14-32-2 · Meeting 3 this season — the Kraken lead the season series 2–1
Kraken beat the Blackhawks
Chances were even (3.0 to 3.4 expected goals); the Kraken won 6–2. Arvid Soderblom allowed 2.0 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 3.0 expected goals to 3.4, on 28 and 34 shots on goal.
SEA 3.0 xG · 28 shots
CHI 3.4 xG · 34 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.2 · 1.3
2nd
1.0 · 1.0
3rd
0.8 · 1.1
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Jared McCann · 1st 04:34 · 1–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Jaden Schwartz · 1st 07:12 · 2–0 · deflected shot, a good chance (22%)
3
Joey Anderson · 1st 17:20 · 2–1 · slap shot, a good chance (15%)
4
Alexander Wennberg · 2nd 00:15 · 3–1
5
Brandon Tanev · 2nd 17:28 · 4–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
6
Nick Foligno · 3rd 00:39 · 4–2 · tip in shot, a great chance (26%)
7
Tomas Tatar · 3rd 04:28 · 5–2 · wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
8
Tomas Tatar · 3rd 16:22 · 6–2 · snap shot on a rebound, a good chance (15%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Kraken win 43.
SEA 43%CHI 57%
Goals and penalties
8 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Jared McCann · 1st 04:34 · 1–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Jaden Schwartz · 1st 07:12 · 2–0
Deflected shot, a good chance (22%)
3
Joey Anderson · 1st 17:20 · 2–1
Slap shot, a good chance (15%)
4
Alexander Wennberg · 2nd 00:15 · GWG · 3–1
5
Brandon Tanev · 2nd 17:28 · 4–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (12%)
6
Nick Foligno · 3rd 00:39 · PP · 4–2
Tip in shot, a great chance (26%)
7
Tomas Tatar · 3rd 04:28 · 5–2
Wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
8
Tomas Tatar · 3rd 16:22 · 6–2
Snap shot on a rebound, a good chance (15%)
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
32/34 saves · 2 GA · 3.4 xGA
Stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
23/28 saves · 5 GA · 3.0 xGA
Allowed 2.0 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.