Tampa Bay Lightning
TBL · 26-20-3
1–4
FinalL
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 16-29-5
1ST2ND3RDT
TBL
19011015135
CHI
072826421
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
TBL 26-20-3 · CHI 16-29-5 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Lightning fell to the Blackhawks
The Lightning created the better chances (3.7 to 2.2 expected goals) — and lost 1–4. Arvid Soderblom stopped 2.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Lightning created the better chances: 3.7 expected goals to 2.2, on 35 and 21 shots on goal.
TBL 3.7 xG · 35 shots
CHI 2.2 xG · 21 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st · the swing
1.4 · 0.4
2nd
0.9 · 1.2
3rd
1.3 · 0.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Brayden Point · 1st 03:34 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Connor Bedard · 2nd 10:19 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3
Landon Slaggert · 2nd 18:14 · 1–2 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
4
Ryan Donato · 3rd 08:02 · 1–3 · wrist shot, a good chance (21%)
5
Teuvo Teravainen · 3rd 19:03 · 1–4 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Lightning win 73.
TBL 73%CHI 27%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Brayden Point · 1st 03:34 · 1–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Connor Bedard · 2nd 10:19 · PP · 1–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3
Landon Slaggert · 2nd 18:14 · GWG · 1–2
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
4
Ryan Donato · 3rd 08:02 · 1–3
Wrist shot, a good chance (21%)
5
Teuvo Teravainen · 3rd 19:03 · EN · 1–4
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
17/20 saves · 3 GA · 2.2 xGA
Allowed 0.8 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
34/35 saves · 1 GA · 3.7 xGA
Stopped 2.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.