TBL
2–0
UTA
Final · W
Tampa Bay Lightning
TBL · 33-14-4
2–0
FinalW
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 27-21-4
1ST2ND3RDT
TBL
01116112229
UTA
0120808028
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Lightning lead the season series 2–0
TBL 33-14-4 · UTA 27-21-4 · Meeting 2 this season — the Lightning lead the season series 2–0
Lightning beat the Mammoth
Chances were even (3.4 to 3.7 expected goals); the Lightning won 2–0. Andrei Vasilevskiy stopped 3.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 3.4 expected goals to 3.7, on 29 and 28 shots on goal.
TBL 3.4 xG · 29 shots
UTA 3.7 xG · 28 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.0 · 1.4
2nd
1.1 · 1.3
3rd
1.3 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Darren Raddysh · 2nd 17:38 · 1–0 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
2
Anthony Cirelli · 3rd 19:14 · 2–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Lightning win 46.
TBL 46%UTA 54%
Goals and penalties
2 goals · 0 penalties← Lightning shoot this way
Mammoth shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Darren Raddysh · 2nd 17:38 · PP · GWG · 1–0
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (7%) that found a way in
2
Anthony Cirelli · 3rd 19:14 · PP · 2–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
28/28 saves · 0 GA · 3.7 xGA
Stopped 3.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
27/29 saves · 2 GA · 3.4 xGA
Stopped 1.4 more goals than an average goalie would have.
