VAN
2–0
CHI
Final · W
Vancouver Canucks
VAN · 32-11-4
2–0
FinalW
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 14-31-2
1ST2ND3RDT
VAN
21207010229
CHI
09010012031
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Canucks lead the season series 2–0
VAN 32-11-4 · CHI 14-31-2 · Meeting 2 this season — the Canucks lead the season series 2–0
Canucks beat the Blackhawks
The Canucks earned it: 3.7 expected goals to 2.8, and a 2–0 win to show for it. Thatcher Demko stopped 2.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Canucks created the better chances: 3.7 expected goals to 2.8, on 29 and 31 shots on goal.
VAN 3.7 xG · 29 shots
CHI 2.8 xG · 31 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st · the swing
2.1 · 1.1
2nd
0.7 · 0.7
3rd
0.9 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Pius Suter · 1st 01:47 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Quinn Hughes · 1st 06:40 · 2–0 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Canucks win 63.
VAN 63%CHI 37%
Goals and penalties
2 goals · 0 penalties← Canucks shoot this way
Blackhawks shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Pius Suter · 1st 01:47 · GWG · 1–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Quinn Hughes · 1st 06:40 · 2–0
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
No goals or penalties.
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
31/31 saves · 0 GA · 2.8 xGA
Stopped 2.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
27/29 saves · 2 GA · 3.7 xGA
Stopped 1.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
