VAN
1–4
UTA
Final · L
Vancouver Canucks
VAN · 10-15-3
1–4
FinalL
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 14-12-3
1ST2ND3RDT
VAN
01101418133
UTA
181723418
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Canucks trail the season series 0–1
VAN 10-15-3 · UTA 14-12-3 · First meeting this season — the Canucks trail the season series 0–1
Canucks fell to the Mammoth
The Canucks created the better chances (3.3 to 2.1 expected goals) — and lost 1–4. Karel Vejmelka stopped 2.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Canucks created the better chances: 3.3 expected goals to 2.1, on 33 and 18 shots on goal.
VAN 3.3 xG · 33 shots
UTA 2.1 xG · 18 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.9
2nd · the swing
1.7 · 0.5
3rd
0.7 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Mikhail Sergachev · 1st 16:00 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2
Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 14:05 · 0–2 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
3
Arshdeep Bains · 3rd 04:17 · 1–2 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
4
Kevin Stenlund · 3rd 17:52 · 1–3 · backhand shot, a good chance (19%)
5
John Marino · 3rd 19:24 · 1–4 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Canucks win 70.
VAN 70%UTA 30%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Canucks shoot this way
Mammoth shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Mikhail Sergachev · 1st 16:00 · PP · 0–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (5%) that found a way in
2
Nick Schmaltz · 2nd 14:05 · GWG · 0–2
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (8%) that found a way in
3
Arshdeep Bains · 3rd 04:17 · 1–2
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
4
Kevin Stenlund · 3rd 17:52 · 1–3
Backhand shot, a good chance (19%)
5
John Marino · 3rd 19:24 · EN · 1–4
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
3
Aatu Räty, Jonathan Lekkerimäki · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
1–2
No penalties
Goaltending
14/17 saves · 3 GA · 2.1 xGA
Allowed 0.9 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
32/33 saves · 1 GA · 3.3 xGA
Stopped 2.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
