WPG
0–2
PHI
Final · L
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 28-10-4
0–2
FinalL
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 23-14-6
1ST2ND3RDT
WPG
011011013035
PHI
11511605236
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Jets trail the season series 0–1
WPG 28-10-4 · PHI 23-14-6 · First meeting this season — the Jets trail the season series 0–1
Jets fell to the Flyers
Chances were even (3.2 to 2.8 expected goals); the Jets lost 0–2. Samuel Ersson stopped 3.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 3.2 expected goals to 2.8, on 35 and 36 shots on goal.
WPG 3.2 xG · 35 shots
PHI 2.8 xG · 36 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.7 · 0.5
2nd
0.7 · 1.8
3rd · the swing
1.7 · 0.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Cam Atkinson · 1st 14:47 · 0–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Cam Atkinson · 2nd 02:52 · 0–2 · wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (19%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Jets win 56.
WPG 56%PHI 44%
Goals and penalties
2 goals · 0 penalties← Jets shoot this way
Flyers shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Cam Atkinson · 1st 14:47 · GWG · 0–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Cam Atkinson · 2nd 02:52 · PP · 0–2
Wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (19%)
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
34/36 saves · 2 GA · 2.8 xGA
Stopped 0.8 more goals than an average goalie would have.
35/35 saves · 0 GA · 3.2 xGA
Stopped 3.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
