WPG
2–1
PIT
Final · W
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 31-14-5
2–1
FinalW
Pittsburgh Penguins
PIT · 23-19-7
1ST2ND3RDT
WPG
21307011231
PIT
08116012136
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
WPG 31-14-5 · PIT 23-19-7 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Jets beat the Penguins
The Jets earned it: 3.1 expected goals to 2.5, and a 2–1 win to show for it. Connor Hellebuyck stopped 1.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Jets created the better chances: 3.1 expected goals to 2.5, on 31 and 36 shots on goal.
WPG 3.1 xG · 31 shots
PIT 2.5 xG · 36 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.2 · 0.5
2nd
0.7 · 1.2
3rd
1.2 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Mark Scheifele · 1st 10:20 · 1–0 · slap shot, a good chance (17%)
2
Nino Niederreiter · 1st 15:39 · 2–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (20%)
3
Bryan Rust · 2nd 14:08 · 2–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Jets win 60.
WPG 60%PIT 40%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Jets shoot this way
Penguins shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Mark Scheifele · 1st 10:20 · 1–0
Slap shot, a good chance (17%)
2
Nino Niederreiter · 1st 15:39 · GWG · 2–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (20%)
3
Bryan Rust · 2nd 14:08 · 2–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
35/36 saves · 1 GA · 2.5 xGA
Stopped 1.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
29/31 saves · 2 GA · 3.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
