WPG
3–0
UTA
Final · W
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 12-1-0
3–0
FinalW
Utah Mammoth
UTA · 5-5-3
1ST2ND3RDT
WPG
01211026328
UTA
060807021
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Jets lead the season series 1–0
WPG 12-1-0 · UTA 5-5-3 · First meeting this season — the Jets lead the season series 1–0
Jets beat the Mammoth
Chances were even (2.1 to 1.7 expected goals); the Jets won 3–0. Connor Hellebuyck stopped 1.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 2.1 expected goals to 1.7, on 28 and 21 shots on goal.
WPG 2.1 xG · 28 shots
UTA 1.7 xG · 21 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.8 · 0.2
2nd
0.8 · 0.7
3rd
0.5 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Gabriel Vilardi · 2nd 17:57 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (14%)
2
Nino Niederreiter · 3rd 07:30 · 2–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (15%)
3
Nino Niederreiter · 3rd 17:01 · 3–0 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Jets win 58.
WPG 58%UTA 42%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Jets shoot this way
Mammoth shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Gabriel Vilardi · 2nd 17:57 · PP · GWG · 1–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (14%)
2
Nino Niederreiter · 3rd 07:30 · 2–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (15%)
3
Nino Niederreiter · 3rd 17:01 · EN · 3–0
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
21/21 saves · 0 GA · 1.7 xGA
Stopped 1.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
25/27 saves · 2 GA · 2.1 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
