WPG
3–0
NSH
Final · W
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 27-10-1
3–0
FinalW
Nashville Predators
NSH · 11-19-7
1ST2ND3RDT
WPG
0918211328
NSH
090706022
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
WPG 27-10-1 · NSH 11-19-7 · Meeting 2 this season — the season series is tied 1–1
Jets beat the Predators
The Jets earned it: 4.2 expected goals to 1.6, and a 3–0 win to show for it. Connor Hellebuyck stopped 1.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Jets created the better chances: 4.2 expected goals to 1.6, on 28 and 22 shots on goal.
WPG 4.2 xG · 28 shots
NSH 1.6 xG · 22 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
0.7 · 0.6
2nd
0.7 · 0.3
3rd · the swing
2.8 · 0.7
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Dylan DeMelo · 2nd 17:18 · 1–0 · wrist shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Gabriel Vilardi · 3rd 13:44 · 2–0 · snap shot, a great chance (25%)
3
Gabriel Vilardi · 3rd 14:46 · 3–0 · wrist shot, a great chance (34%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Jets win 86.
WPG 86%NSH 14%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Jets shoot this way
Predators shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Dylan DeMelo · 2nd 17:18 · GWG · 1–0
Wrist shot, a good chance (11%)
2
Gabriel Vilardi · 3rd 13:44 · PP · 2–0
Snap shot, a great chance (25%)
3
Gabriel Vilardi · 3rd 14:46 · PP · 3–0
Wrist shot, a great chance (34%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
22/22 saves · 0 GA · 1.6 xGA
Stopped 1.6 more goals than an average goalie would have.
25/28 saves · 3 GA · 4.2 xGA
Stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
