WPG
3–0
CAR
Final · W
Winnipeg Jets
WPG · 38-14-3
3–0
FinalW
Carolina Hurricanes
CAR · 32-18-4
1ST2ND3RDT
WPG
11216112330
CAR
0801209029
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Jets lead the season series 1–0
WPG 38-14-3 · CAR 32-18-4 · First meeting this season — the Jets lead the season series 1–0
Jets beat the Hurricanes
The Jets earned it: 3.4 expected goals to 2.3, and a 3–0 win to show for it. Eric Comrie stopped 2.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Jets created the better chances: 3.4 expected goals to 2.3, on 30 and 29 shots on goal.
WPG 3.4 xG · 30 shots
CAR 2.3 xG · 29 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
1.0 · 0.7
2nd
0.6 · 1.0
3rd · the swing
1.8 · 0.6
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Nino Niederreiter · 1st 19:18 · 1–0 · snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2
Neal Pionk · 2nd 03:13 · 2–0 · slap shot, a good chance (18%)
3
Rasmus Kupari · 3rd 16:17 · 3–0 · poke shot, a good chance (16%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Jets win 67.
WPG 67%CAR 33%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Jets shoot this way
Hurricanes shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Nino Niederreiter · 1st 19:18 · PP · GWG · 1–0
Snap shot, a good chance (16%)
2
Neal Pionk · 2nd 03:13 · PP · 2–0
Slap shot, a good chance (18%)
3
Rasmus Kupari · 3rd 16:17 · 3–0
Poke shot, a good chance (16%)
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
29/29 saves · 0 GA · 2.3 xGA
Stopped 2.3 more goals than an average goalie would have.
27/30 saves · 3 GA · 3.4 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
