CHI
1–2
MIN
Final · L
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 14-35-2
1–2
FinalL
Minnesota Wild
MIN · 22-23-5
1ST2ND3RDT
CHI
0119011121
MIN
1110816225
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 2 this season — the Blackhawks trail the season series 0–2
CHI 14-35-2 · MIN 22-23-5 · Meeting 2 this season — the Blackhawks trail the season series 0–2
Blackhawks fell to the Wild
The Blackhawks were outchanced (3.1 to 2.0 expected goals) and lost 1–2. Petr Mrazek stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Wild created the better chances: 3.1 expected goals to 2.0, on 25 and 21 shots on goal.
CHI 2.0 xG · 21 shots
MIN 3.1 xG · 25 shots
0
1
2
3
1st · the swing
0.0 · 1.6
2nd
1.1 · 0.7
3rd
0.9 · 0.8
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
· 1st 12:27 · 0–1 · slap shot, a good chance (15%)
2
Nick Foligno · 2nd 13:44 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
3
Marcus Foligno · 3rd 10:07 · 1–2 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blackhawks win 32.
CHI 32%MIN 68%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Blackhawks shoot this way
Wild shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
· 1st 12:27 · 0–1
Slap shot, a good chance (15%)
2
Nick Foligno · 2nd 13:44 · 1–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (19%)
3
Marcus Foligno · 3rd 10:07 · GWG · 1–2
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
23/25 saves · 2 GA · 3.1 xGA
Stopped 1.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
20/21 saves · 1 GA · 2.0 xGA
Stopped 1.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
