CHI
1–3
PHI
Final · L
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 15-39-3
1–3
FinalL
Philadelphia Flyers
PHI · 30-20-7
1ST2ND3RDT
CHI
170807122
PHI
11621403333
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Blackhawks trail the season series 0–1
CHI 15-39-3 · PHI 30-20-7 · First meeting this season — the Blackhawks trail the season series 0–1
Blackhawks fell to the Flyers
Chances were even (2.5 to 2.4 expected goals); the Blackhawks lost 1–3. Samuel Ersson stopped 1.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 2.5 expected goals to 2.4, on 22 and 33 shots on goal.
CHI 2.5 xG · 22 shots
PHI 2.4 xG · 33 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.8 · 0.8
2nd
0.7 · 1.3
3rd
1.0 · 0.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Travis Sanheim · 1st 06:18 · 0–1 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2
Colin Blackwell · 1st 07:35 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (18%)
3
Travis Konecny · 2nd 03:15 · 1–2 · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
4
Garnet Hathaway · 2nd 11:55 · 1–3 · wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (37%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blackhawks win 52.
CHI 52%PHI 48%
Goals and penalties
4 goals · 0 penalties← Blackhawks shoot this way
Flyers shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Travis Sanheim · 1st 06:18 · 0–1
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
2
Colin Blackwell · 1st 07:35 · 1–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (18%)
3
Travis Konecny · 2nd 03:15 · GWG · 1–2
Wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
4
Garnet Hathaway · 2nd 11:55 · 1–3
Wrist shot on a rebound, a great chance (37%)
1st period
2nd period
3
Unassisted · wrist shot, a low-percentage shot (2%) that found a way in
1–2
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
30/33 saves · 3 GA · 2.4 xGA
Allowed 0.6 more goals than expected from the shots he faced.
21/22 saves · 1 GA · 2.5 xGA
Stopped 1.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
