CHI
1–4
DET
Final · L
Chicago Blackhawks
CHI · 5-8-1
1–4
FinalL
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 6-5-1
1ST2ND3RDT
CHI
01019010129
DET
1619210425
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Blackhawks trail the season series 0–1
CHI 5-8-1 · DET 6-5-1 · First meeting this season — the Blackhawks trail the season series 0–1
Blackhawks fell to the Red Wings
The Blackhawks were outchanced (2.9 to 1.7 expected goals) and lost 1–4.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Red Wings created the better chances: 2.9 expected goals to 1.7, on 25 and 29 shots on goal.
CHI 1.7 xG · 29 shots
DET 2.9 xG · 25 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.5 · 1.1
2nd
0.6 · 0.9
3rd
0.7 · 0.9
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Alex DeBrincat · 1st 19:58 · 0–1 · wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (19%)
2
Nick Foligno · 2nd 08:42 · 1–1 · backhand shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
3
Dylan Larkin · 2nd 12:27 · 1–2 · wrist shot, a good chance (16%)
4
Joseph Veleno · 3rd 03:03 · 1–3 · deflected shot, a good chance (17%)
5
Andrew Copp · 3rd 17:47 · 1–4 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Blackhawks win 29.
CHI 29%DET 71%
Goals and penalties
5 goals · 0 penalties← Blackhawks shoot this way
Red Wings shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Alex DeBrincat · 1st 19:58 · 0–1
Wrist shot on a rebound, a good chance (19%)
2
Nick Foligno · 2nd 08:42 · 1–1
Backhand shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
3
Dylan Larkin · 2nd 12:27 · GWG · 1–2
Wrist shot, a good chance (16%)
4
Joseph Veleno · 3rd 03:03 · 1–3
Deflected shot, a good chance (17%)
5
Andrew Copp · 3rd 17:47 · EN · 1–4
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
2nd period
2
Tyler Bertuzzi, Connor Murphy · backhand shot on a rebound, a low-percentage shot (1%) that found a way in
1–1
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
21/24 saves · 3 GA · 2.9 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
28/29 saves · 1 GA · 1.7 xGA
Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
