DET
3–0
NSH
Final · W
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 10-5-4
3–0
FinalW
Nashville Predators
NSH · 9-9-2
1ST2ND3RDT
DET
06211112329
NSH
0701207026
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Red Wings lead the season series 1–0
DET 10-5-4 · NSH 9-9-2 · First meeting this season — the Red Wings lead the season series 1–0
Red Wings beat the Predators
The Red Wings were outchanced (3.5 to 2.7 expected goals) but won 3–0 anyway. Ville Husso stopped 3.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Predators created the better chances: 3.5 expected goals to 2.7, on 26 and 29 shots on goal.
DET 2.7 xG · 29 shots
NSH 3.5 xG · 26 shots
0
1
2
3
1st
0.2 · 0.8
2nd
1.1 · 1.7
3rd
1.4 · 1.0
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Dylan Larkin · 2nd 04:09 · 1–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Filip Hronek · 2nd 14:16 · 2–0 · slap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
3
Michael Rasmussen · 3rd 19:39 · 3–0 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Red Wings win 38.
DET 38%NSH 62%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Red Wings shoot this way
Predators shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Dylan Larkin · 2nd 04:09 · GWG · 1–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
2
Filip Hronek · 2nd 14:16 · PP · 2–0
Slap shot, a low-percentage shot (6%) that found a way in
3
Michael Rasmussen · 3rd 19:39 · EN · 3–0
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
26/26 saves · 0 GA · 3.5 xGA
Stopped 3.5 more goals than an average goalie would have.
26/28 saves · 2 GA · 2.7 xGA
Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
