DET
2–1
CGY
Final · W
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 22-20-8
2–1
FinalW
Calgary Flames
CGY · 24-18-10
1ST2ND3RDT
DET
051814217
CGY
01219015136
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Red Wings lead the season series 1–0
DET 22-20-8 · CGY 24-18-10 · First meeting this season — the Red Wings lead the season series 1–0
Red Wings beat the Flames
Chances were even (2.3 to 2.2 expected goals); the Red Wings won 2–1. Ville Husso stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 2.3 expected goals to 2.2, on 17 and 36 shots on goal.
DET 2.3 xG · 17 shots
CGY 2.2 xG · 36 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.8 · 0.5
2nd
1.2 · 0.4
3rd · the swing
0.3 · 1.2
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Blake Coleman · 2nd 18:07 · 0–1 · tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2
Dylan Larkin · 2nd 19:46 · 1–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (10%)
3
Filip Zadina · 3rd 05:51 · 2–1 · wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Red Wings win 52.
DET 52%CGY 48%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Red Wings shoot this way
Flames shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Blake Coleman · 2nd 18:07 · 0–1
Tip in shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
2
Dylan Larkin · 2nd 19:46 · PP · 1–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (10%)
3
Filip Zadina · 3rd 05:51 · GWG · 2–1
Wrist shot, a good chance (13%)
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
35/36 saves · 1 GA · 2.2 xGA
Stopped 1.2 more goals than an average goalie would have.
15/17 saves · 2 GA · 2.3 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
