DET
1–2
CAR
Final · L
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 15-10-4
1–2
FinalL
Carolina Hurricanes
CAR · 16-12-1
1ST2ND3RDT
DET
0811107126
CAR
110115014239
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Red Wings trail the season series 0–1
DET 15-10-4 · CAR 16-12-1 · First meeting this season — the Red Wings trail the season series 0–1
Red Wings fell to the Hurricanes
The Red Wings were outchanced (3.9 to 1.5 expected goals) and lost 1–2. Ville Husso stopped 1.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Hurricanes created the better chances: 3.9 expected goals to 1.5, on 39 and 26 shots on goal.
DET 1.5 xG · 26 shots
CAR 3.9 xG · 39 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st · the swing
0.3 · 1.3
2nd
0.4 · 1.2
3rd
0.7 · 1.4
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Jack Drury · 1st 04:48 · 0–1 · tip in shot, a great chance (37%)
2
Michael Rasmussen · 2nd 05:20 · 1–1 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3
Jordan Staal · 2nd 11:49 · 1–2 · poke shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Red Wings win 15.
DET 15%CAR 85%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Red Wings shoot this way
Hurricanes shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Jack Drury · 1st 04:48 · 0–1
Tip in shot, a great chance (37%)
2
Michael Rasmussen · 2nd 05:20 · 1–1
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (4%) that found a way in
3
Jordan Staal · 2nd 11:49 · GWG · 1–2
Poke shot, a low-percentage shot (9%) that found a way in
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
37/39 saves · 2 GA · 3.9 xGA
Stopped 1.9 more goals than an average goalie would have.
25/26 saves · 1 GA · 1.5 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
