DET
3–0
NSH
Final · W
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 1-1-0
3–0
FinalW
Nashville Predators
NSH · 0-2-0
1ST2ND3RDT
DET
0811024322
NSH
016012014042
goals · shots on goal
First meeting this season — the Red Wings lead the season series 1–0
DET 1-1-0 · NSH 0-2-0 · First meeting this season — the Red Wings lead the season series 1–0
Red Wings beat the Predators
The Red Wings were outchanced (4.1 to 2.7 expected goals) but won 3–0 anyway. Cam Talbot stopped 4.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
The Predators created the better chances: 4.1 expected goals to 2.7, on 42 and 22 shots on goal.
DET 2.7 xG · 22 shots
NSH 4.1 xG · 42 shots
0
1
2
3
4
1st
1.3 · 1.3
2nd
1.0 · 1.5
3rd · the swing
0.4 · 1.3
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
J.T. Compher · 2nd 01:02 · 1–0 · tip in shot, a good chance (13%)
2
Andrew Copp · 3rd 06:35 · 2–0 · deflected shot, a great chance (37%)
3
Dylan Larkin · 3rd 19:40 · 3–0 · wrist shot, into an empty net
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Red Wings win 30.
DET 30%NSH 70%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Red Wings shoot this way
Predators shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
J.T. Compher · 2nd 01:02 · GWG · 1–0
Tip in shot, a good chance (13%)
2
Andrew Copp · 3rd 06:35 · 2–0
Deflected shot, a great chance (37%)
3
Dylan Larkin · 3rd 19:40 · EN · 3–0
Wrist shot, into an empty net
1st period
No goals or penalties.
2nd period
3rd period
No penalties
Goaltending
42/42 saves · 0 GA · 4.1 xGA
Stopped 4.1 more goals than an average goalie would have.
19/21 saves · 2 GA · 2.7 xGA
Stopped 0.7 more goals than an average goalie would have.
