DET
2–1
BOS
Final · W
Detroit Red Wings
DET · 34-33-6
2–1
FinalW
Boston Bruins
BOS · 30-35-9
1ST2ND3RDT
DET
191706222
BOS
091804121
goals · shots on goal
Meeting 3 this season — the Red Wings trail the season series 1–2
DET 34-33-6 · BOS 30-35-9 · Meeting 3 this season — the Red Wings trail the season series 1–2
Red Wings beat the Bruins
Chances were even (2.1 to 2.0 expected goals); the Red Wings won 2–1. Cam Talbot stopped 1.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
Who had the better chances
Expected goals (xG) score every shot by how often shots like it go in: distance, angle, type, rebound, rush. Adding them up shows who created the better chances, whatever the scoreboard says.
Chances were close: 2.1 expected goals to 2.0, on 22 and 21 shots on goal.
DET 2.1 xG · 22 shots
BOS 2.0 xG · 21 shots
0
1
2
1st
0.5 · 1.1
2nd · the swing
1.2 · 0.4
3rd
0.4 · 0.5
Tap a numbered goal to see how it happened.
1
Marco Kasper · 1st 05:37 · 1–0 · snap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Lucas Raymond · 2nd 00:53 · 2–0 · slap shot, a good chance (12%)
3
Morgan Geekie · 2nd 02:12 · 2–1 · tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
Deserve to winReplay this game 100 times with average goalies and the Red Wings win 53.
DET 53%BOS 47%
Goals and penalties
3 goals · 0 penalties← Red Wings shoot this way
Bruins shoot this way →
On net
Missed
Bigger = better chance
1Goal, numbered to the list
1
Marco Kasper · 1st 05:37 · 1–0
Snap shot, a low-percentage shot (10%) that found a way in
2
Lucas Raymond · 2nd 00:53 · PP · GWG · 2–0
Slap shot, a good chance (12%)
3
Morgan Geekie · 2nd 02:12 · PP · 2–1
Tip in shot, a good chance (11%)
1st period
2nd period
3rd period
No goals or penalties.
No penalties
Goaltending
20/21 saves · 1 GA · 2.0 xGA
Stopped 1.0 more goals than an average goalie would have.
20/22 saves · 2 GA · 2.1 xGA
Gave up about what the shots he faced would predict.
